Journal of Technologies Information and Communication

Journal of Technologies Information and Communication, 2021 - Volume 2 Issue 1, pp. 27-43
https://doi.org/10.29073/rtic.v2i1.361

Published Online: 13 Apr 2021

Views: 148 | Downloads: 70

I will reflect on the work developed at a distance, and online, in 2020, with the Choir Mozart. I intend to: reflect on methodological guidelines and programmatic principles that, in this context, must underlie a choral group; to show how artistic work can be approached online, using various technological tools so that it is possible, at a distance, and online, to perform activities that reveal the most essential human values; demonstrate the pedagogical potential of digital tools for synchronous and asynchronous communication and cooperation that positively enhance the team meeting and working together at a distance, and online; demonstrate, in the context of teaching and distance work, the technological skills of choristers to perform tasks and activities with an emotional impact.

Distance Education E-learning Choral Group Technological and digital tools Creativity

• ADORNO, Theodor W. (s/d). Teoria Estética. Lisboa: Edições 70.
• AMABILE, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), pp.357–376.
• AMABILE, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (2), pp.393–399.
• AMABILE, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, pp.185–201.
• AMABILE, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• AMABILE, T. M. e PILLEMER, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), pp.3–15.
• APARICIO TERRASA, Helena; CASTELLÀ LIDON, Josep Maria (2009). Reflexiones sobre la lectura multimodal: el caso del PowerPoint. In: Daniel Cassani (Org.), Para ser letrados. Voces y miradas sobre la lectura (217-231). Barcelona: Paidós.
• BIASUTTI, Michele (2015). Assessing a Collaborative Online Environment for Music Composition. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 18 (3), Jul., pp.49-63.
• BUCKINGHAM, David (2010). Cultura digital, educação midiática e o lugar da escolarização. Educação e Realidade, Porto Alegre: UFRGS, N.3, V.35, set./dez, pp.37-58.
• CRUZ, G. e DOMINGUEZ, C. (2020). Engaging students, teachers, and professionals with 21st century skills: the ‘Critical Thinking Day’ proposal as an integrated model for engineering educational activities. In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), April (pp. 1969–1974).
• DATU, J. A. D., YUEN, M. e CHEN, G. (2018). The triarchic model of grit is linked to academic success and well-being among Filipino high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), pp.428–438.
• DAVIS, G. A. (1969). Training creativity in adolescence: A discussion of strategy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 3(2), pp.95–104.
• DWYER, C. P. e WALSH, A. (2020). An exploratory quantitative case study of critical thinking development through adult distance learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, pp.17–35.
• ENGERMAN, J. A., MACALLAN, M., CARR-CHELLMAN, A. A. (2018). Games for boys: A qualitative study of experiences with commercial off the shelf gaming. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, pp.313–339.
• FLORIDI, Luciano (1999). Philosophy and Computing. An introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
• GARCIA-ARETIO, Lorenzo [Coord.], RUIZ-CORBELLA, Marta e DOMÍNGUEZ FIGAREDO, Daniel (2007). De la educación a distancia a la educación virtual. Barcelona: Ariel.
• GARRONI, Emilio (1992). Criatividade. Enciclopédia Einaudi, 25, Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda, pp.349-424.
• HÄMÄLÄINEN, R. e VÄHÄSANTANEN, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6 (3),pp.169–184.
• HARRIS, R. (1998). Introduction to creative thinking. <http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook1.htm> (acesso 21.1.21)
• HOEVER, I. J., VAN KNIPPENBERG, D., VAN GINKEL, W. P. e BARKEMA, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97 (5), pp.982–996.
• JOHNSON, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• KAUFMAN, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
• LAN, X. e MOSCARDINO, U. (2019). Direct and interactive effects of perceived teacher-student relationship and grit on student wellbeing among stay-behind early adolescents in urban China. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, pp.129–137.
• LANCHEROS, Abril; STELLA, Myriam(2018). Motivación del aprendizaje en línea. Revista Panorama, Vol.12 (22), ene-jun, pp.43-56.
• LITTLETON, K. (2011). Social interaction and learning. In S. Jarvela (Ed.). Social and emotional aspects of learning (149–155). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• LIU, K., TAI, S. D. e LIU, C. (2018). Enhancing language learning through creation: The effect of digital storytelling on student learning motivation and performance in a school English course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, pp.913–935.
• MAAK, T.e PLESS, N. (Eds.) (2006). Responsible leadership. London/New York: Routledge.
• MORAWSKI, Stefan (1977). Fundamentos de estética. Barcelona: Ediciones Península.
• MUIRHEAD, Brent (2005). Encouraging Creativity in Online University Classes. Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.2 (3), Oct.-Dec., pp.13-17.
• MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan (1973). Il significato dell'estética. Torino: Einaudi.
• NACU, D., MARTIN, C. K., e PINKARD, N. (2018). Designing for 21st century learning online: A heuristic method to enable educator learning support roles. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), pp.1029–1049.
• NEAGU, Gelu (2019). Innovative Techniques and Methods in Contemporary Musical Education. Bulletin of the TransilvaniaUniversity of Brasov, Series VIII: Performing Arts. 2019, Vol.12 (1), pp.53-64.
• NUSSBAUM, Miguel et al. (2020). Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online. Educational Technology Research And Development, 9 nov.
• OZTOP, Pinar, GUMMERUM, Michaela (2020). Group creativity in children and adolescents. Cognitive Development, V.56, October-December, pp.1-14.
• PÉREZ GÓMEZ, Ángel (2012). Educarse en la era digital. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
• PERRY-SMITH, J. E. e SHALLEY, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 28 (1), pp. 89–106.
• PLESS, N. (2007). Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers: the case of Dame Anita Roddick, Founder of The Body Shop. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), pp.437-457.
• ROOK, Laura; MCMANUS, Lisa (2020). Responding to COVID-19: Enriching Students’ Responsible Leadership through an Online Work-Integrated Learning Project. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, V.21 (5), pp.601-616.
• ROOK, Laura; MCMANUS, Lisa (2020). Responding to COVID-19: Enriching Students’ Responsible Leadership through an Online Work-Integrated Learning Project. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, V.21 (5), pp.601-616
• RYAN, R. M. e DECI, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), pp.54–67.
• RYAN, R. M. e DECI, E. L. (2000). Self‐determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well‐being. American Psychologist, 55(1), pp.68–78.
• SAWYER, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: NY: Basic Books.
• SELMAN, R. L., BEARDSLEE, W., SCHULTZ, L. H., KRUPA, M. e PODOREFSKY, D. (1986). Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: Toward the integration of functional and structural models. Developmental Psychology, 22, pp.450–459.
• SERÓN, Francisco J. (2019). Arte, ciencia, tecnología y sociedad: Un enfoque para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de las ciencias en un contexto artístico. Revista iberoamericana de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, Vol. 14 (40), pp.197-224
• SHALLEY, C. E., ZHOU, J. e OLDHAM, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), pp.933–958.
• SHEN, T. e LAI, J. (2014). Formation of creative thinking by analogical performance in creative works. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, pp.1159–1167.
• SHNEIDERMAN, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12), 20–32.
• STEINER, George (1993). Presenças Reais. As Artes do Sentido. Lisboa: Editorial Presença.
• WERHANE, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.
• YANG, X., LIN, L., CHENG, P. Y., YANG, X., REN, Y. e HUANG, Y. M. (2018). Examining creativity through a virtual reality support system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), pp.1231–1254.
• ZHANG, X. e BARTOL, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), pp.107–128.
• ZHANG, Xinru; PI, Zhongling; LI, Chenyu; HU, Weiping (2020). Intrinsic motivation enhances online group creativity via promoting members’ effort, not interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, Dec 4.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.